Interested in learning more about how to do math like an ancient Egyptian, check out David Reimer’s book Count Like an Egyptian.
Princeton University Press Blog
Mind over chatter since 1905
Interested in learning more about how to do math like an ancient Egyptian, check out David Reimer’s book Count Like an Egyptian.
Join the fun on May 29 at 7:00 PM as the Princeton Public Library and Princeton University Press welcome David Reimer, professor of mathematics and statistics at The College of New Jersey, for an exploration of the world of ancient Egyptian math and the lessons it holds for mathematicians of all levels today.
Prof. Reimer will present a fun introduction to the intuitive and oftensurprising art of ancient Egyptian math. Learn how to solve math problems with ancient Egyptian methods of addition, subtraction, multiplication and division and discover key differences between Egyptian math and modern day calculations (for example, in spite of their rather robust and effective mathematics, Egyptians did not possess the concept of fractions).
Following the lecture, Prof. Reimer will sign copies of his new book, Count Like an Egyptian. Copies of will be available for purchase at the lecture or you can pick up a copy ahead of time at Labyrinth Books.
Try this fun Pi Day activity this year. Mathematician Tim Chartier has a recipe that is equal parts delicious and educational. Using chocolate chips and the handy printouts below, mathematicians of all ages can calculate the value of pi. Start with the Simple as Pi recipe, then graduate to the Death by Chocolate Pi recipe. Take it to the next level by making larger grids at home. If you try this experiment, take a picture and send it in and we’ll post it here.
Download: Simple as Pi [Word document]
Download: Death by Chocolate Pi [Word document]
For details on the math behind this experiment please read the article below which is crossposted from Tim’s personal blog. And if you like stuff like this, please check out his new book Math Bytes: Google Bombs, ChocolateCovered Pi, and Other Cool Bits in Computing.
For more Pi Day features from Princeton University Press, please click here.
How can a kiss help us learn Calculus? If you sit and reflect on answers to this question, you are likely to journey down a mental road different than the one we will traverse. We will indeed use a kiss to motivate a central idea of Calculus, but it will be a Hershey kiss! In fact, we will have a small kiss, more like a peck on the cheek, as we will use white and milk chocolate chips. The math lies in how we choose which type of chip to use in our computation.
Let’s start with a simple chocolatey problem that will open a door to ideas of Calculus. A Hershey’s chocolate bar, as seen below, is 2.25 by 5.5 inches. We’ll ignore the depth of the bar and consider only a 2D projection. So, the area of the bar equals the product of 2.25 and 5.5 which is 12.375 square inches.
Note that twelve smaller rectangles comprise a Hershey bar. Suppose I eat 3 of them. How much area remains? We could find the area of each small rectangle. The total height of the bar is 2.25 inches. So, one smaller rectangle has a height of 2.25/3 = 0.75 inches. Similarly, a smaller rectangle has a width of 5.5/4 = 1.375. Thus, a rectangular piece of the bar has an area of 1.03125, which enables us to calculate the remaining uneaten bar to have an area of 9(1.03125) = 9.28125 square inches.
Let’s try another approach. Remember that the total area of the bar is 12.375. Nine of the twelve rectangular pieces remain. Therefore, 9/12ths of the bar remains. I can find the remaining area simply be computing 9/12*(12.375) = 9.28125. Notice how much easier this is than the first method. We’ll use this idea to estimate the value of π with chocolate, but this time we’ll use chocolate chips!
Let’s compute the area of a quarter circle of unit radius, which equals π/4 since the full circle has an area of π. Rather than find the exact area, let’s estimate. We’ll break our region into squares as seen below.
This is where the math enters. We will color the squares red or white. Let’s choose to color a square red if the upper righthand corner of the square is in the shaded region and leave it white otherwise, which produces:
Notice, we could have made other choices. We could color a square red if the upper lefthand corner or even middle of the square is under the curve. Some choices will lead to more accurate estimates than others for a given curve. What choice would you make?
Again, the quarter circle had unit radius so our outer square is 1 by 1. Since eight of the 16 squares are filled, the total shaded area is 8/16.
How can such a grid of red and white squares yield an estimate of π? In the grid above, notice that 8/16 or 1/2 of the area is shaded red. This is also an approximation to the area of the quarter circle. So, 1/2 is our current approximation to π/4. So, π/4 ≈ 1/2. Solving for π we see that π ≈ 4*(1/2) = 2. Goodness, not a great estimate! Using more squares will lead to less error and a better estimate. For example, imagine using the grid below:
Where’s the chocolate? Rather than shading a square, we will place a milk chocolate chip on a square we would have colored red and a white chocolate chip on a region that would have been white. To begin, the six by six grid on the left becomes the chocolate chip mosaic we see on the right, which uses 14 white chocolate of the total 36 chips. So, our estimate of π is 2.4444. We are off by about 0.697.
Next, we move to an 11 by 11 grid of chocolate chips. If you count carefully, we use 83 milk chocolate chips of the 121 total. This gives us an estimate of 2.7438 for π, which correlates to an error of about 0.378.
Finally, with the help of public school teachers in my seminar Math through Popular Culture for the Charlotte Teachers Institute, we placed chocolate chips on a 54 by 54 grid. In the end, we used 2232 milk chocolate chips giving an estimate of 3.0617 having an error of 0.0799.
What do you notice is happening to the error as we reduce the size of the squares? Indeed, our estimates are converging to the exact area. Here lies a fundamental concept of Calculus. If we were able to construct such chocolate chip mosaics with grids of ever increasing size, then we would converge to the exact area. Said another way, as the area of the squares approaches zero, the limit of our estimates will converge to π. Keep in mind, we would need an infinite number of chocolate chips to estimate π exactly, which is a very irrational thing to do!
And finally, here is our group from the CTI seminar along with Austin Totty, a senior math major at Davidson College who helped present these ideas and lead the activity, with our chocolatey estimate for π.
In January, we will publish Beautiful Geometry by Eli Maor and with illustrations by Eugen Jost. The book is equal parts beauty and mathematics and we were grateful that both authors took time to answer some questions for our readers. We hope you enjoy this interview.
Look for a slideshow previewing the art from the book in the New Year.
PUP: How did this book come to be? Where did you get the idea to create a book of Beautiful Geometry?
Eli Maor [EM]: It all started some five years ago through a mutual acquaintance of us by the name Reny Montandon, who made me aware of Eugen’s beautiful geometric artwork. Then, in 2010, I met Eugen in the Swiss town of Aarau, where I was invited to give a talk at their famous Cantonal high school where young Albert Einstein spent two of his happiest years. We instantly bonded, and soon thereafter decided to work together on Beautiful Geometry. To our deep regret, Reny passed away just a few months before we completed the project that he helped to launch. We dearly miss him.
PUP: Eugen, where did your interest in geometric artwork come from? Are you a mathematician or an artist by training?
Eugen Jost [EJ]: I have always loved geometry. For me, mathematics is an endless field in which I can play as an artist and I am also intrigued by questions that arise between geometry and philosophy.
For example, Euclid said: A point is that which has no part, and a line is what has no widths. Which raises questions for me as an artist—Do geometric objects really exist, then? Are the points and lines that I produce really geometric objects? With Adobe Illustrator you can transform points and lines into “nonexisting” paths, which brings you deeper into geometry.
But, ultimately, it’s not my first purpose to illustrate mathematics—I just want to play and I’m happy if the onlooker of my pictures starts to play as well.
PUP: How did you decide which equations to include?
EM: It’s not so much about equations as about theorems. Of course, geometry has hundreds, if not thousands of theorems to choose from, so we had to be selective. We didn’t have any particular rules to guide us; sometimes Eugen would choose a particular theorem for which he had some artistic design in mind; in other cases we based our selection on theorems with an interesting history, or just for their simplicity. But we always had the artistic point of view in mind: our goal was to showcase the beauty of geometry and make it known to a wide public.
EJ: I think I’m seldom looking for mathematical topics with which I can make pictures. It’s the other way round: mathematics and geometry comes to me. A medieval town, the soles of your shoes, wheel rims, textile printing, patterns in pine cones: wherever I look I see mathematics and beautiful geometry. Euclid’s books among many others provide me with ideas, too.
Often I develop ideas when I’m walking in the woods with our dog or I’m scribbling in my small black diaries while I’m sitting in trains. At home I transform the sketches into pictures.
PUP: Were there any theorems you didn’t get to include but would have liked to?
EM: Yes, there were many theorems we would have liked to have included, but for practical reasons we decided to limit ourselves to about 50 chapters. That leaves us plenty of subjects for Beautiful Geometry II
PUP: Are there some theorems that simply didn’t lend themselves to artistic depictions?
EJ: In our book you won’t find many threedimensional objects depicted. In my art I tend to create flat objects (circles, triangles, squares …) on surfaces and threedimensional objects in space. Therefore we avoided theorems that have to do with space—with few exceptions.
PUP: Can you describe the layout of the book? How is it organized?
EM: We followed a more or less chronological sequence, but occasionally we grouped together subjects that are logically related to one another, so as to make the flow of ideas easier to follow.
PUP: The collaboration between you and Eugen Jost reminds me of a lyricist and musician—how did the two of you work together? Did you write and he created art alongside or did he have art already done and you wrote for it?
EM: Yes, that comparison between a lyricist (in opera we call it librettist) and a musician is very apt. As I mentioned earlier, we didn’t have a rigid guideline to follow; we just played with many ideas and decided which ones to include. We exchanged over a thousand emails between us (yes, Eugen actually counted them!) and often talked on Skype, so this aspect of our collaboration was easy. I can’t imagine having done that twenty years ago…
EJ: Communicating with Eli was big fun. He has so many stories to tell and very few of them are restricted to geometry. In 2012, when we thought our manuscript was finished, Eli and his wife came to Switzerland. For many days we travelled and hiked around lakes, cities and mountains with our manuscripts in our book sacks. We discussed all the chapters at great length. In some chapters, the relationship between Eli’s text and my pictures is very close and the art helps readers understand the text. In others, the connection is looser. Readers are invited to get the idea of a picture more or less independently—sort of like solving a riddle.
PUP: Most of the art in the book are original pieces by Eugen, right? Where did you find the other illustrations?
EM: Most of the artwork is Eugen’s work. He also took excellent photographs of sites with interesting geometric patterns or a historical significance related to our book. I have in mind, for example, his image of the famous headstone on the grave of Jakob Bernoulii in the town of Basel, Switzerland, which has the wrong spiral engraved on it—a linear spiral instead of a logarithmic one!
PUP: That is fascinating and also hints at What Eugen mentioned earlier–math and the beauty of math is hidden in plain sight, all around us. Are there other sites that stand out to you, Eugen?
EJ: Yesterday I went to Zurich. While I was walking through the streets I tried to find answers to your question. Within half an hour I found over a dozen examples of the mathematics that surrounds us:
Mathematics and Beautiful Geometry is everywhere around us—we just have to open our eyes.
PUP: What equation does the artwork on the cover of the book illustrate? Can you give us a quick “reading” of it?
EM: The front cover shows the Sierpinski Triangle, named after Polish mathematician Waclaw Sierpinski (18821969). It is a bizarre construction, a trianglelike shape that has zero area but an infinite perimeter. This is but one of many fractaltype patterns that have become popular thanks to the ability to create them with modern computers, often adding dazzling color to make them into exquisite works of art.
PUP: Eugen, what is your process to create a piece of art like this?
EJ: Unfortunately, the Sierpinski Triangle was not my own idea, but I was awestruck by the idea of a shape with an infinitely little area and an infinite perimeter, so I started to think about how it could be depicted. Like most of the pictures in the book, I created this piece of art on a computer. At the same time, I was immersed in other mathematical ideas like the Menger sponge, the Hilbert curve, the Koch snowflake. Of course Sierpinski himself and countless others must have sketched similar triangles, but that was the challenge for our book: to take theorems and to transform them into independent pieces of art that transcend mere geometric drawings.
PUP: Eli, do you have a favorite piece of art in the book?
EM: Truth be told, every piece of art in our book is my favorite! But if I must choose one, I’ll go for the logarithmic spiral that Eugen realized so beautifully in Plate 34.1; it is named spira mirabilis (“The miraculous spiral”), the name that Bernoulli himself used to describe his favorite curve.
PUP: We asked the mathematician to pick his favorite piece of art, so it is only fair that we should ask the artist to pick his favorite theorem. Do you have one, Eugen?
EJ: Being Eli’s first reader for the last three years has been a joy because he tells history and stories in our book. I like the chapter on the surprising theorem of George Alexander Pick, in part because of the biographical details. Eli describes how Pick bonded with Albert Einstein in Prague—imagine Einstein and Pick playing the violin and the viola together! Sadly, Pick ended his life in the concentration camp at Theresienstadt, but he left behind this wonderful contribution to mathematics.
PUP: Are there any particularly surprising pieces of art in the book that might have a good backstory or illustrate a particularly memorable equation?
EM: Again, this puts me in a difficult position – to choose among so many interesting subjects that are covered in our book. But if I have to pick my choice, I’d go for Plate 26.1, entitled PI = 3. The title refers to what has been called the “Biblical value of PI” and refers to a verse in the Bible (I Kings vii 23) which, if taken literally, would lead to a value of PI = 3. Our plate shows this value surrounded by the famous verse in its original Hebrew.
PUP: Writing a book is a long process filled with countless hours of hard work. Do any moments from this period stand out in particular?
EJ: I remember sitting in a boat on the lake of Thun with Eli and his wife Dalia in the spring of 2012. Eli and I were pondering on the chapter doubling the cube. As I mentioned before, I do not like to draw threedimensional objects on a flat surface, so I didn’t want to depict a traditional cube. I was playing instead with the unrolling of two cubes, one having the double volume of the other. Eli was not sure this would work, but on the boat we thoroughly discussed it and all of a sudden Eli said, “Eugen, you have sold me on it.” I hadn’t heard that expression before. I then had a queasy conscience because I didn’t know whether I should have been flexible enough to leave my own idea for a better one. Ultimately, the art came out quite well and really illustrates the Delian problem.
A chance encounter gave me a sense of the broad appeal of the book. I was sitting at a table with a highly trained engineer and I told him about our book. I then tried to explain the theorem of Morley: In any triangle, the three points of intersection of the adjacent angle trisectors form an equilateral triangle. His response was “You don’t suppose that you could solve any statical problem with this, do you?”
PUP: Math is often quite visual, but where did the idea of making it both visual and beautiful come from?
EM: We are not the first, of course, to point out the visual beauty of many geometric theorems or patterns, but usually these gems are depicted in stark, blackandwhite designs of lines and curves. Adding colors to these designs – and sometimes a bit of humor and imagination – makes all the difference between strictly mathematical beauty and a true work of art. This is what has really inspired us in writing our book.
PUP: Who do you hope reads Beautiful Geometry?
EM: We aim at a broad audience of students, teachers and instructors at all levels, and above all, laypersons who enjoy the beauty of patterns and are not afraid of a simple math equation here and there. We hope not to disappoint them!
Wassim Haddad, Winner of the 2014 Pendray Aerospace Literature Award, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Professor Wassim Haddad of the School of Aerospace Engineering and chair of the Flight Mechanics and Control Discipline at Georgia Institute of Technology “has been selected to receive the 2014 Pendray Aerospace Literature Award. This is the highest honor in literature bestowed by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA). The award is presented for an outstanding contribution or contributions to aeronautical and astronautical literature in the relatively recent past.”
The citation of Prof. Haddad’s award reads “Paramount and fundamental contributions to the literature of dynamical systems and control for largescale aerospace systems.”
Prof. Haddad’s award is given in part for the research in his book, coauthored with Sergey G. Nersesov and published by PUP in 2011: Stability and Control of LargeScale Dynamical Systems: A Vector Dissipative Systems Approach
Modern complex largescale dynamical systems exist in virtually every aspect of science and engineering, and are associated with a wide variety of physical, technological, environmental, and social phenomena, including aerospace, power, communications, and network systems, to name just a few. This book develops a general stability analysis and control design framework for nonlinear largescale interconnected dynamical systems, and presents the most complete treatment on vector Lyapunov function methods, vector dissipativity theory, and decentralized control architectures.
Wassim M. Haddad is a professor in the School of Aerospace Engineering and chair of the Flight Mechanics and Control Discipline at Georgia Institute of Technology.
Martin Gardner, an acclaimed popular mathematics and science writer and author of Undiluted HocusPocus: The Autobiography of Martin Gardner, would have had his 99th birthday this month. In honor of this special occasion, the mathematical community is putting together a number of birthday celebrations.
MoMath joins the fun on October 26th from 10:00 – 5:00 with a Celebration of the Mind.
At this familyfriendly event, math fans of all ages will enjoy some closeup magic tricks, explore favorite Gardner puzzles, and make their own hexaflexagon to take home (how many people can say they have their own hexaflexagon?!). As an added challenge, try to spot the two exhibits that Gardner asked Museum directors to include in MoMath.
Later that evening, MoMath will welcome Martin Gardner’s son James Gardner and a panel of experts for a discussion:
Event:  Who is Martin Gardner? A Conversation with Friends, Colleagues, and Family 
Date and Time:  Saturday, October 26, 6:30 pm 
What is it?  A panel of people who knew Martin Gardner well will share their favorite stories about him and reveal just how important his contributions have been to mathematics and to math lovers around the world. Ask questions, talk with the presenters, and share your own memories and stories. 
Who is participating? 
James Gardner (University of Oklahoma, Martin Gardner’s son) John Conway (Emeritus Professor of Mathematics, Princeton University) Mark Setteducati (President, Gathering 4 Gardner) Neil Sloane (The OEIS Foundation and Rutgers University) Colm Mulcahy (Spelman College and Author of Mathematical Card Magic: FiftyTwo New Effects) 
Location: 
National Museum of Mathematics 11 East 26th Street, New York, NY 10010 
Contact:  (212) 5420566  info@momath.org 
Space will fill up for this event, so please preregister here: http://momath.org/about/
There are many Celebration of Mind events taking place around the world. Check out the map (http://celebrationofmind.org/) to find events close to you.
Martin Gardner, an acclaimed popular mathematics and science writer and author of Undiluted HocusPocus: The Autobiography of Martin Gardner, would have had his 99th birthday this month. In honor of this special occasion, the mathematical community is putting together a number of events celebrating this Gardner.
At Princeton University on October 25th from 6:30 – 8:30 PM in the Friend Center, Room 101, there is a free public lecture by Tadashi Tokieda on toy Models. He will share with you some unique toys he has made and collected, and show you the mathematics and physics behind them. Following the lecture, a panel of people who knew Martin Gardner well will share their favorite stories about him. You will have time to ask questions and talk with the presenters and share your memories as well.
Mark Setteducati (President, Gathering 4 Gardner) Panel Moderator
James Gardner (University of Oklahoma, Martin Gardner’s son)
John Conway (Emeritus Professor of Mathematics, Princeton University)
Colm Mulcahy (Spelman College and Author of Mathematical Card Magic: FiftyTwo New Effects)
There are many Celebration of Mind events taking place around the world. Check out the map (http://celebrationofmind.org/) and you can find event close to you.
Martin Gardner, an acclaimed popular mathematics and science writer and author of Undiluted HocusPocus: The Autobiography of Martin Gardner, would have had his 99th birthday this month. In honor of this special occasion, the mathematical community is putting together a number of birthday celebrations.
MoMath joins the fun on October 26th from 10:00 – 5:00 with a Celebration of the Mind.
At this familyfriendly event, math fans of all ages will enjoy some closeup magic tricks, explore favorite Gardner puzzles, and make their own hexaflexagon to take home (how many people can say they have their own hexaflexagon?!). As an added challenge, try to spot the two exhibits that Gardner asked Museum directors to include in MoMath.
Later that evening, MoMath will welcome Martin Gardner’s son James Gardner and a panel of experts for a discussion:
Event:  Who is Martin Gardner? A Conversation with Friends, Colleagues, and Family 
Date and Time:  Saturday, October 26, 6:30 pm 
What is it?  A panel of people who knew Martin Gardner well will share their favorite stories about him and reveal just how important his contributions have been to mathematics and to math lovers around the world. Ask questions, talk with the presenters, and share your own memories and stories. 
Who is participating? 
James Gardner (University of Oklahoma, Martin Gardner’s son) John Conway (Emeritus Professor of Mathematics, Princeton University) Mark Setteducati (President, Gathering 4 Gardner) Neil Sloane (The OEIS Foundation and Rutgers University) Colm Mulcahy (Spelman College and Author of Mathematical Card Magic: FiftyTwo New Effects) 
Location: 
National Museum of Mathematics 11 East 26th Street, New York, NY 10010 
Contact:  (212) 5420566  info@momath.org 
Space will fill up for this event, so please preregister here: http://momath.org/about/
There are many Celebration of Mind events taking place around the world. Check out the map (http://celebrationofmind.org/) to find events close to you.
Climate Change: a Movie and the Math
By Ian Roulstone and John Norbury
Next week the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) will release the first of three reports that constitute their Fifth Assessment Report on climate change. This first report, The Physical Science Basis, will cover a huge range of topics from the carbon cycle to extreme weather. But climate prediction also relies heavily on mathematics, which is used to quantify uncertainties and improve the models.
The role of math is illustrated by a remarkable video of our everchanging weather. Last month the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) decommissioned Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite 12 (GOES12), which monitored our weather for the past 10 years from its isolated vantage point 36,000 kilometers above America and the Atlantic Ocean.
GOES12 had seen it all – from wildfires, volcanic ash, and landscape parched by drought, to Hurricanes Ike, Katrina and Sandy, and the blizzards that gripped the central United States in the winter of 200910. NOAA created a video – 187 seconds and 3641 images – one snapshot from each day of its operational life, which amounts to 10 years’ weather flashing before our eyes in just over 3 minutes. It’s dramatic and amazing:
In Scientific American, Evelyn Lamb commented on how this video highlights “a tension between the unpredictability of the weather and its repetitiveness”. Even after a few seconds it becomes clear that the patterns revealed by clouds differ from one part of the globe to another. Great towering cumulonimbus bubble up and unleash thunderstorms in tropical regions every day, while in more temperate midlatitudes, the ubiquitous low pressure systems whirl across the Atlantic carrying their warm and cold fronts to Europe. The occasional hurricane, spawned in the tropics, careers towards the United States (Hurricane Sandy can be seen at about 2’50’’). But the mayhem is orchestrated: the cyclones almost seem like a train of ripples or waves, following preferred tracks, and the towering storms are confined largely to the tropics.

In fact, this movie is affording us a glimpse of a remarkable world – it is a rollercoaster ride on the ‘weather attractor’.
An ‘attractor’ is a mathematician’s way of representing recurring behavior in complex systems, such as our atmosphere. A familiar illustration of an attractor can be seen in the figure below, and it is named after one of the fathers of chaos, Edward Lorenz.

It is impossible to illustrate the weather attractor for the atmosphere in terms of a simple threedimensional image: Lorenz’s very simple model of a circulating cell had only three variables. Our modern computer models used in climate prediction have around 100 million variables, so the attractor resides in a space we cannot even begin to visualise. And this is why the movie created by NOAA is so valuable: it gives us a vivid impression of the repetitiveness emerging from otherwise complex, chaotic behaviour.
Weather forecasters try to predict how our atmosphere evolves and how it moves around the attractor – a hugely difficult task that requires us to explore many possible outcomes (called an ensemble of forecasts) when trying to estimate the weather several days ahead. But climate scientists are faced with a very different problem: instead of trying to figure out which point on the 100 milliondimensional attractor represents the weather 100 years from now, they are trying to figure out whether the shape of the attractor is changing. In other words, are the butterfly wings ‘folding’ as the average weather changes? This is a mathematician’s way of quantifying climate change.
If 100 years from now, when a distant successor of GOES12 is retired, our descendants create a movie of this future weather, will they see the same patterns of recurring behaviour, or will there be more hurricanes? Will the waves of cyclones follow different tracks? And will tropical storms be more intense? Math enables us to “capture the pattern” even though chaos stops us from saying exactly what will happen, and to calculate answers to these questions we have to calculate how the weather attractor is changing.
This article is crossposted with the Huffington Post: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ianroulstone/climatepredictionmathematics_b_3961853.html
For further insights into the math behind weather and climate prediction, see Roulstone and Norbury’s new book Invisible in the Storm: The Role of Mathematics in Understanding Weather.
Davidson College student, Jane Gribble, was our March Mathness winner this year. Below she explains how she filled in her bracket.
I love basketball – Davidson College basketball. As a Davidson College cheerleader I have an enormous amount of school pride, especially when it comes to our basketball team. However, outside of Davidson College I know little to nothing about college basketball. I knew that UNC Chapel Hill was having a tough season because this is my sister’s alma mater. Also, I knew that New Mexico, Gonzaga, Duke, and Montana were all likely teams for the NCAA tournament because we had played these nonconference teams during our season and these were the most talked about nonconference games around campus. My name is Jane Gribble. I am a junior mathematics major and this is the first year I completed a bracket.
In Dr. Tim Chartier’s MAT 210 – Mathematical Modeling course we discussed sports ranking using the Colley method and the Massey method. We were given the opportunity to apply our new knowledge of sports ranking in the NCAA Tournament Challenge. Since Davidson College was participating in the tournament my focus was on one game, the Davidson/Marquette game in Lexington, KY. When we traveled to KY I thought I had missed my opportunity to fill out a bracket, but one of my classmates was also traveling for the game with the Davidson College Pep Band and had the modeling program on his computer. We completed our brackets in the hotel lobby in Kentucky the night before our game.
My bracket used the Massey method because in previous years it has had better success than the Colley method. I decided to submit only one bracket, a bracket solely based on math (partially because I know little about college basketball). As a cheerleader and a prideful student it upset me to have Davidson losing against Marquette the following night, but I wasn’t going to let a math model crush my personal dreams of success in the tournament. The home games were weighted as .5 (it would have been 1 if it was an unweighted model) to take into account home court advantage. Similarly, away games were weighted as 1.5 and neutral games as 1. Also, the season was segmented into 6 equal sections. I believe games at the end of the season are more important than games at the beginning of the season because teams change throughout the year and the last games give the best perspective of the teams going into the tournament. There was no real reason for the numbers chosen, other than they increased each segment. The 6 equal sections were weighted: .4, .6, .8, 1, 1.5, and 2. With these weights in the Massey method my model correctly predicted the Minnesota upset, but missed the Ole Miss, LaSalle, Harvard, and Florida Gulf upsets.
After Davidson’s tragic loss I could not watch anymore basketball for a while. I even forgot that my bracket was in the competition. I only started paying attention to the brackets when a friend in the same competition congratulated me on being second going into the Elite 8; my math based bracket was in the top 10 percent of all the brackets. Once he told me my bracket had a chance of winning, I paid attention to the rest of the games to see how my bracket was doing in the competition. After Davidson’s loss against Louisville last year in the tournament I never wanted to cheer for Louisville. To my surprise, I went into the final game this year cheering for Louisville because my model had Louisville winning it all. I was not cheering for Louisville because of any connections with the team, but was cheering to receive a free ice cream cone, a prize that our local Ben and Jerry’s donates to the winner of Dr. Chartier’s class pool.
Next year I hope to compete in the NCAA tournament challenge again. This year I greatly enjoyed the experience and want to continuing submitting brackets for the tournament. Next year I will submit one bracket that uses the exact weightings of my bracket this year to see how it compares from year to year. This year I wanted to submit a math bracket that looked at teams who had injuries throughout the season. My motivation for this was Davidson’s player Clint Mann. Clint had to sit out many games towards the end of the season because of a concussion, but he had recovered in time for the NCAA tournament. I thought that our wins during the time without Clint showed our strengths as a team. Unfortunately this year I ran out of time to code this additional weighting. Hopefully next year my submissions will include a bracket using the weights from this year, a bracket that includes weights for teams with injured team members, and another bracket with varying weights.
Ed Belbruno’s life and discoveries are the subject of a new documentary titled Painting the Way to the Moon by Jacob Akira Okada. Belbruno, a trained mathematician, discovered new ways to navigate the universe by taking advantage of gravitational pulls of various celestial bodies. Because of his work, space missions now use less fuel to traverse the stars and planets. And millions of Angry Birds Space fans should also thank Belbruno because his research is what determines the birds’ trajectories around space bodies and through gravitational pulls to eventual pig annihilation.
In the documentary, Belbruno, a brilliant painter in addition to mathematician and space scientist, credits his discovery to a Van Goghstyle painting he made of possible travel routes through space for his inspiration. Enjoy the complete trailer below:
Curious about Belbruno’s research? Please check out these Princeton University Press titles. Fly Me to the Moon is intended for general audiences, while Capture Dynamics and Chaotic Motions in Celestial Mechanics is a specialized textbook.

Fly Me to the Moon


Capture Dynamics and Chaotic Motions in Celestial Mechanics

Dave Richeson, author of Euler’s Gem, was interviewed on the Wild about Math! podcast this weekend.
Listen in at the Wild about Math! site or Download the MP3
Here is what interviewer Sol Lederman says about the program, “Professor Dave Richeson is one of the most exuberant math people I’ve gotten to know but I didn’t know how exuberant he was until I interviewed him. He’s also involved in a bunch of neat projects. It was one of these projects, documented in Dave Richeson’s blog article, How I teach topology: an inquirybased learning approach, that caught my attention since I have a real passion for collaborative learning….Richeson is a mathematician, math professor, and math blogger. He loves topology and geometry among other things. He’s taught inquirybased math which engages students to the nth degree, he wrote a book for Princeton University Press “Euler’s Gem,” about Euler’s polyhedron formula, he’s working on a new book about four classic construction problems, and he’s finishing up an article “Who first proved that C/d is a constant?” We discuss all these things on this podcast.”
Winner of the 2010 Euler Book Prize, Mathematical Association of America
One of CHOICE Magazine’s Outstanding Academic Titles, 2009
Princeton University Press Blog is proudly powered by WordPress.
These are the bestselling books for the past week.
1177 BC: The Year Civilization Collapsed by Eric H. Cline  
Why Government Fails So Often: And How It Can Do Better by Peter H. Schuck  
Count Like an Egyptian: A HandsOn Introduction to Ancient Mathematics by David Reimer  
Tesla: Inventor of the Electrical Age by W. Bernard Carlson  
Everyday Calculus: Discovering the Hidden Math All around Us by Oscar E. Fernandez  
Beetles of Eastern North America by Arthur V. Evans  
The Soul of the World by Roger Scruton  
Faust I & II by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe  
On Bullshit by Harry G. Frankfurt  
The Transformation of the World: A Global History of the Nineteenth Century by Jürgen Osterhammel (trans. Patrick Camiller) 
Copyright © 2014 · News Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in